Learn how to stop divorce, solve your marriage problems, improve marital sex, and save your marriage with expert advice
Minggu, 30 November 2008
What I Miss About Being Married...
I have been divorced for over 3 and 1/2 years and it has been 5 years since the separation. Up until recently I could not think of many things I missed about being married. I certainly did not miss my ex and many of his annoying habits-especially his snoring! I enjoy sleeping alone in my king size bed, being free to do whatever I want and not having answer to anyone. Single life is good. Yet recently I have found myself remembering some of the things about marriage that I do miss.
I miss having a partner there to help with the kids. It is tough having to be both mom and dad, 24/7 and not being able to have someone there to share the burden. I also miss having a husband there to share the financial responsibilities. When you are married and have two incomes coming into the household, it does make life easier.
And as independent as I profess to be, I think I am starting to miss having a life partner who is always there to share in the good times and bad, someone who is not only your spouse but your best friend. I used to think of my ex as my best friend early on in the marriage. It was a wonderful feeling when I felt I could trust him and that he was always going to be there for me.
Even though my ex eventually betrayed my trust, I hope I will someday be able to trust someone like that again. Maybe then I will be ready to give marriage another try. But for now I will remain single and enjoy every minute of it.
Why a "Rebound" Relationship Can Be Good for You...
You have most likely have heard the warnings about the "rebound" man or woman. This is the first person you have a relationship with after your divorce. The typical advice is to take it slow and not get too attached because rebound relationships often do not last.
That may be true and the advice to be careful so that you do not suffer a double blow-first a divorce and then a failed relationship-is sound. But there are benefits to having a rebound relationship after your divorce.
One benefit is the distraction the new relationship provides. You may be still reeling from your divorce and having many issues lingering. Your new relationship provides you with excitement, fun and the thrill of being in love again. These positive emotions can help keep your mind off of the divorce and bring back some joy in your life again.
Another benefit is a boost to your self esteem. If your ex was emotionally abusive or did not pay attention to you and put you down often, having a new lover who showers you with attention and compliments can do wonders for your self esteem. You start believing that you are an attractive again and someone who can be loved.
So go ahead and enjoy your new relationship after your divorce. But understand that you may not be emotionally ready for a serious, committed relationship so soon after your divorce. If you have not resolved the issues from your marriage and gone through the grieving process, you could be setting yourself up for another failed relationship. The key is to keep your new relationship light and fun and enjoy it for what it is worth. Be in the moment and take it one step at a time without expectations, while giving yourself the time you need to recover fully from your divorce.
Sabtu, 29 November 2008
CELLULOID MOMENTS
Would You Marry for the Money?
I was flipping through the channels the other night and caught a few minutes of the show about the " Real Housewives of Orange County". This 30 year old blonde who looked like Barbie was getting a new 4 carat diamond ring from her 60 something year old boyfriend. She admitted that she was not attracted to him at first since he reminded her of Santa Claus or Kenny Rogers with his white hair and beard, but now is is deeply in love with him.
This man has been married 5 times and she will be his 6th wife. Maybe she does loves him but it sounded like she loved his money even more. I know there are people who do marry for the money but I wonder how can you be happy with someone if you are not attracted to them and do not love them?
Sure money makes life easier and it must be tempting to marry someone well off . But what price do you pay emotionally? I once knew a woman in her 50's who was divorced and met a man in his late 70's. He was wealthy and had no children or family. Believe it or not, after they married at the courthouse they drove straight to the lawyer's office and had his will changed, making her the sole beneficary of his estate.
Years later, he did die and she inherited all of his money. Although she married him for financial security, they did have a good relationship through the years, and she cared for him but was not in love with him. She got his money and he got a wife and the extended family he never had, including her grandchildren, so I guess it worked for both of them.
Have you ever considered marrying someone you did not love because they were rich? If you met a wealthy potential partner would you date him or her because they were rich, even if you were not attracted to them? Be honest!
My answer would be that I could not be intimate with someone I was not attracted to, no matter how much money he had. Ideally, it would be great to find the whole package: love and financial security. But I rather be married to a man who was not well off that I deeply loved than a rich one I was not attracted to.
Kamis, 27 November 2008
Are Sick Days Marital property in IL?
In re Marriage of Abrell, No. 4-06-0974 (November 19, 2008) Sangamon County (Knecht) (MYERSCOUGH, partial concurrence, partial dissent) Affirmed in part, reversed in part, remanded.
Trial court erred when it concluded that accumulated sick and vacation days by husband, a State employee, are marital property subject to division in the dissolution of the parties' marriage. However, the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied husband's motion to reconsider its award of maintenance. Although trial court concluded that wife was essentially, unemployable in its memorandum of opinion, fact that she obtained full time employment, after proofs had closed in case but before judgment was entered, is not newly discovered evidence. The trial court, instead, properly considered the motion to reconsider as a motion to modify. However, it should have reduced the maintenance award based on the wife's newly acquired employment as of the date of filing the motion; although it was not required to reduce the maintenance by more than the $250 per month set by the court.
Rabu, 26 November 2008
JUNGLE ESCAPE
I confess that I can only identify one or two of the competitors although I was surprised to see Martina Navratilova of tennis circuit fame amongst them. The Daily Mail seems to believe that she could be there because she’s lonely, following a reportedly acrimonious split from her partner after a seven year relationship. From what I've seen, however, anyone feeling down and alone after a break-up of whatever length should be extremely guarded if contacted to appear on a reality television programme, especially one set in the jungle. Forging friendships with stink bugs, cockroaches and snakes can hardly be the perfect antidote to loneliness; try meeting people closer to home instead and if you really do fancy getting closer to nature what about dog walking in the countryside; it has to be better for your health and well-being.
Senin, 24 November 2008
Minggu, 23 November 2008
IN MEMORIAM
The trouble with death is that whilst we know it will happen one day, we never know when. That’s why I advise clients to make or change their wills as soon as possible. Whilst divorcing couples don’t necessarily make a habit of dying before completing the process it’s always prudent to have paperwork in order.
Once upon a time I received a letter from a client whose divorce I had just concluded, telling me that she intended to contact our wills department as I’d originally advised and in the meantime had been in touch with her pension scheme managers to nominate payment of her death in service benefit and had given them my firm’s contact details. A couple of years later I heard from the same scheme managers asking for my bank details as the client had died unexpectedly and wanted me to receive her death in service lump sum benefit valued at three times her annual salary. Obviously there had to be a mistake; no matter how good a job I had done for her, I did not believe that I could have been the intended beneficiary. Despite the letter that the client had written to me, there was no will and I extracted my old file to re-read the correspondence. It had clearly been the client’s intention for her two children to benefit and she also believed that she had done no more than pass my firm’s contact details to her pension administrator. Fortunately we were able to sort this, but how much easier if the paperwork had been in order.
Jumat, 21 November 2008
Rabu, 19 November 2008
Selasa, 18 November 2008
New Blog
Please note that I have developed a new blog which will hopefully evolve into an interactive site. It is called The Marriage Maven and you can access it right from the links to the right
Please feel free to offer topics of discussion and ask questions. I am excited about this new venture and hope you will be too so please let me know what you think-
Maven
New Blog
Please note that I have developed a new blog which will hopefully evolve into an interactive site. It is called The Marriage Maven and you can access it right from the links to the right
Please feel free to offer topics of discussion and ask questions. I am excited about this new venture and hope you will be too so please let me know what you think-
Maven
CONSERVATIVE POLICY
Members of Resolution regularly see the injustice suffered when the relationships of cohabiting couples break down. Even after decades together, many people find themselves homeless and facing real financial hardship. This is fuelled by a widely-held misconception that cohabiting couples have “common law” rights combined with existing law that is unclear and inadequate.
That’s why Resolution wants a new law to protect cohabiting couples and hopes that the Government will support Lord Lester’s ‘Cohabitation Bill’ which he will be introducing in the Lords in December, aimed at giving rights to couples who live together.
Senin, 17 November 2008
Minggu, 16 November 2008
For Those of You Still Posting Pictures:
I am still getting people trying to convince me that Facebook and Myspace are wonderful outlets to connect with family and friends. Placing pictures of family and friends on the Internet is just something I have a hard time feeling comfortable about. All of you need to read a post from a fellow blogger who had her pictures taken from her site and put on a porno site. She was notified by some good Samaritan and the pictures were removed. What in fact if she had never known and met some people who had run across her pictures on such a site? Would their view of this women have been tainted? What about prospective employers? Go to her site and read her horror story: http://blawgcoop.com/lawmom/
For Those of You Still Posting Pictures:
I am still getting people trying to convince me that Facebook and Myspace are wonderful outlets to connect with family and friends. Placing pictures of family and friends on the Internet is just something I have a hard time feeling comfortable about. All of you need to read a post from a fellow blogger who had her pictures taken from her site and put on a porno site. She was notified by some good Samaritan and the pictures were removed. What in fact if she had never known and met some people who had run across her pictures on such a site? Would their view of this women have been tainted? What about prospective employers? Go to her site and read her horror story: http://blawgcoop.com/lawmom/
Sabtu, 15 November 2008
VIRTUALLY DIVORCED
CORN furniture store 22
Originally uploaded by Linden Lab
I confess that I don’t understand the fascination of virtual reality games. “What’s wrong with real life,” I find myself screaming. Little Girl and her friends, however, enjoy playing with Sims and I now learn that for adults addicted to the online world there are sites such as “Second Life”. There you create an avatar and then presumably live either a mirror image of your own life or, if you have the imagination, a totally different one. The website itself claims to offer “a 3-D virtual world created by its Residents..(which).. has grown explosively and today is inhabited by millions of Residents from around the globe.”
A real life London couple are reported today as divorcing because of the antics of the husband’s avatar. It seems it has been found indulging in extra-marital relations with a female avatar and both the real and virtual wives have taken umbrage. So much so that the real wife has spoken to the press and is quoted as describing the actions of her husband’s avatar as the “ultimate betrayal” and “cheating.”
Mind much can be explained by the names of the avatars involved. The wife’s was called Skye, leading one to assume that she could go round with her head in the clouds. The husband’s was called Barmy, which could well have summed up his whole view of virtual life, especially as the husband himself has purportedly said that it’s “a big fuss about nothing.”
Of course, if virtual break-ups are to become commonplace I am wondering if there’s any scope for me to get involved. I was thinking of an avatar called Miss Fortune offering virtual sympathy and divorce. However, I’ve since read that the wife has found a new relationship playing “World of Warcraft” so maybe I should just think about opening a firm in a virtual Anderson shelter under the style of Armageddon and Phoenix.
Jumat, 14 November 2008
Rabu, 12 November 2008
SATISFACTION GUARANTEED
Selasa, 11 November 2008
I'm losing my house....Who can I sue?
Just when you thought you've heard it all my office received a call today from a distraught home owner. The woman indicated that she was in the process of re-negotiating her mortgage with her mortgage company; a concept that until very recently was unheard of. Well she and her husband thought how unfair this whole recession and credit crisis was to people like them and thought that there had to be someone they could sue for causing this. So like any good citizens they opened the phone book and called a local attorney asking who they could sue to cure their ills.
Well my thought was perhaps like GM and Chrysler they could call the treasury department and ask for a bail out. I'm sure they will need less than the 25 million the car companies are asking for so this could be treasury chump change. The question to ask is whether to put in the request during the lame duck administration or once President Elect Obama gets into office. I pretty much have been of the opinion that once the election was over the economy would loosen up some and at least in my business that has been correct. So far I can say an Obama Presidency is good for divorce.
Let's hope his presidency winds up being just as good for the country and the economy.
By the way a funny comment was made to me about my book....yes believe it or not it is actually selling....a judge who read it sent a comment through a friend that he knew I was talking about him when I prefaced my comments on judges before advising the free world to stay clear of the men in the black robes. While this observation is indeed true and he is one of a handful of judges I have nothing but admiration for, my friend said she thought they would all think they were in that group so no worries about offending anyone! I wasn't worried...the truth is a complete defense.
****
By the way save the date January 21st at the Garden Grill in Smithtown 7:00pm I am speaking for Divine Divorce..Don't let me speak to an empty room
I'm losing my house....Who can I sue?
Just when you thought you've heard it all my office received a call today from a distraught home owner. The woman indicated that she was in the process of re-negotiating her mortgage with her mortgage company; a concept that until very recently was unheard of. Well she and her husband thought how unfair this whole recession and credit crisis was to people like them and thought that there had to be someone they could sue for causing this. So like any good citizens they opened the phone book and called a local attorney asking who they could sue to cure their ills.
Well my thought was perhaps like GM and Chrysler they could call the treasury department and ask for a bail out. I'm sure they will need less than the 25 million the car companies are asking for so this could be treasury chump change. The question to ask is whether to put in the request during the lame duck administration or once President Elect Obama gets into office. I pretty much have been of the opinion that once the election was over the economy would loosen up some and at least in my business that has been correct. So far I can say an Obama Presidency is good for divorce.
Let's hope his presidency winds up being just as good for the country and the economy.
By the way a funny comment was made to me about my book....yes believe it or not it is actually selling....a judge who read it sent a comment through a friend that he knew I was talking about him when I prefaced my comments on judges before advising the free world to stay clear of the men in the black robes. While this observation is indeed true and he is one of a handful of judges I have nothing but admiration for, my friend said she thought they would all think they were in that group so no worries about offending anyone! I wasn't worried...the truth is a complete defense.
****
By the way save the date January 21st at the Garden Grill in Smithtown 7:00pm I am speaking for Divine Divorce..Don't let me speak to an empty room
Minggu, 09 November 2008
Kamis, 06 November 2008
Raising the Bar My New Obsession
Yes, I have always been one of those people who needed to do whatever I was told not to do. Tell me not to eat the cookie, I eat the cookie. Tell me not to read the book, I read the book. Tell me not to watch the show, I watch the show. The judge in my case as you may remember from my prior blog, prohibited a 15 year old minor from viewing the show because "everyone is sleeping with everyone." My husband who cannot understand why in the world I would want to watch a show about what I do every day refused to turn over the remote the one time I had caught a glimpse. Watching this show has therefore now become my project dejour. Plus to make matters interesting one of the creators of the show has found his way to my blog and actually commented on a post. So now I really have to stand up and take notice of this new addition to must see TNT TV.
Now the first episode while not as riveting as I am told other episodes actually are, posed some interesting issues for me. As a matrimonial maven and not a criminal maven, I was intrigued that it was allowable for a prosecuting attorney to keep information regarding a potential witness a secret. Especially when that information is that the witness is DEAD!!! Absurd I yelled at my screen. I quickly quizzed my partner who IS a criminal maven and he advised me that indeed the show was accurate. Now that is a foul as far as I'm concerned and should be thrown out as predjudicial. Geez and I thought practicing matrimonial law was playing hardball!!
I could aptly relate to the woman who had her husband arrested for domestic violence and then wanted him released because she couldn't afford the house without him. Now that is more in line with what I deal with every day. But the public defender who was married to the drug addicted doctor, who actually thought about stating that the drugs he prescribed were for her instead, risking her license, put me over the edge. Alright I will be watching another episode this week and will blog about my thoughts if anyone is interested. I'm still not sure what I think of the show, but it did keep my attention so I guess that is good. Stay tuned.....
Raising the Bar My New Obsession
Yes, I have always been one of those people who needed to do whatever I was told not to do. Tell me not to eat the cookie, I eat the cookie. Tell me not to read the book, I read the book. Tell me not to watch the show, I watch the show. The judge in my case as you may remember from my prior blog, prohibited a 15 year old minor from viewing the show because "everyone is sleeping with everyone." My husband who cannot understand why in the world I would want to watch a show about what I do every day refused to turn over the remote the one time I had caught a glimpse. Watching this show has therefore now become my project dejour. Plus to make matters interesting one of the creators of the show has found his way to my blog and actually commented on a post. So now I really have to stand up and take notice of this new addition to must see TNT TV.
Now the first episode while not as riveting as I am told other episodes actually are, posed some interesting issues for me. As a matrimonial maven and not a criminal maven, I was intrigued that it was allowable for a prosecuting attorney to keep information regarding a potential witness a secret. Especially when that information is that the witness is DEAD!!! Absurd I yelled at my screen. I quickly quizzed my partner who IS a criminal maven and he advised me that indeed the show was accurate. Now that is a foul as far as I'm concerned and should be thrown out as predjudicial. Geez and I thought practicing matrimonial law was playing hardball!!
I could aptly relate to the woman who had her husband arrested for domestic violence and then wanted him released because she couldn't afford the house without him. Now that is more in line with what I deal with every day. But the public defender who was married to the drug addicted doctor, who actually thought about stating that the drugs he prescribed were for her instead, risking her license, put me over the edge. Alright I will be watching another episode this week and will blog about my thoughts if anyone is interested. I'm still not sure what I think of the show, but it did keep my attention so I guess that is good. Stay tuned.....